🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare that with what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.