🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on reports in local state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders will decide later this week on a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic stability.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also crafting protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that when you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."