🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with health policies. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “following international guideline limits”, delayed for at least one year after the legislation is approved.

The WHO specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of the Zambian branch states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.